Should women wait for mammograms?

November 17, 2009 But are you putting your life in danger, if you wait until then? A study has led to mixed messages on breast cancer screenings.

For years women have been told to start getting mammograms at the age of 40. Now, a new study says you may want to wait 10 years.

Women should discuss their choices with their physicians as some worry the new recommendations could cost lives.

At Northwestern Memorial Hospital Tuesday women getting their mammogram results debated the new guidelines with caution and anxiety.

"It can be very aggressive disease and early detection and treatment is important so I can imagine for one minute putting it off," said Gabrielle Ringquist.

"The guidelines work against women's health. They are putting women in jeopardy," said Dr Ellen Mendelson, professor of radiology, Northwestern Memorial.

Doctor Davide Bova, a radiologist for Loyola Medical Center, has recommended women over 40 get annual mammograms. He maintains that recommendation even with a new guidelines.

"I still have not seen any evidence to go against the recommendation," said Dr. Davide Bova, Loyola University Medical Center.

The standard recommendation was for women over 40 to get annual mammograms, but the new study recommends women over 50 get mammograms every 2 years.

The new guidelines come from a panel of experts who reviewed previous data and found screening women between 40 and 50 led to false alarms and unneeded biopsies without substantially improving women's odds of survival. Some doctors dispute that summarization.

"A number of studies have shown that screening mammography saves lives even in the 40 to 50 age group. It's probably some where between 15 -20 percent of breast cancers occur in that age group and now those women won't have any screening services," said Dr. Peter Jokich, Rush University Medical Center.

Doctor Jokich is the director of breast imaging at Rush University Medical Center. He is troubled by the new recommendations and thinks they are not in the best interest of the patients.

"I think it's totally ridiculous I may not be politically correct but I think this is really about money and politics and it's the beginning of rationing care and I don't think it's about the health of individual women," said Dr. Jokich.

Many groups have expressed concern.

"Our big fear is that someone will not get diagnosed we know that science tells us that early detection leads to better prognosis we would hate to see someone slip thru the crack," said Christina Koening, Breast Cancer Network of Strength.

For now, patients may find their doctors going with the old guidelines.

"I don't see any evidence in their data...that seems to say sorry it doesn't work in women 40-50," said Dr. Bova, "Until we find out more precise information we need to play it on the safe side."

The Metropolitan Chicago Breast Cancer Task Force reported in the disparity in breast cancer deaths between white women and African American women. The task force president is deeply concerned that these recommendations will delay detection and treatment for African American women.

He says breast cancer occurs more often in younger African American women than younger white women.

Study's new guidelines:

The guidelines are for the general population, not those at high risk of breast cancer because of family history or gene mutations that would justify having mammograms sooner or more often.

The new advice says:

--Most women in their 40s should not routinely get mammograms.

--Women 50 to 74 should get a mammogram every other year until they turn 75, after which the risks and benefits are unknown. (The task force's previous guidelines had no upper limit and called for exams every year or two.)

--The value of breast exams by doctors is unknown. And breast self-exams are of no value.

Medical groups such as the cancer society have been backing off promoting breast self-exams in recent years because of scant evidence of their effectiveness. Decades ago, the practice was so heavily promoted that organizations distributed cards that could be hung in the shower demonstrating the circular motion women should use to feel for lumps in their breasts.

The guidelines and research supporting them were released Monday and are being published in Tuesday's issue of the Annals of Internal Medicine.

The new advice was sharply challenged by the cancer society.

"This is one screening test I recommend unequivocally, and would recommend to any woman 40 and over," the society's chief medical officer, Dr. Otis Brawley, said in a statement.

The task force advice is based on its conclusion that screening 1,300 women in their 50s to save one life is worth it, but that screening 1,900 women in their 40s to save a life is not, Brawley wrote.

That stance "is essentially telling women that mammography at age 40 to 49 saves lives, just not enough of them," he said. The cancer society feels the benefits outweigh the harms for women in both groups.

International guidelines also call for screening to start at age 50; the World Health Organization recommends the test every two years, Britain says every three years.

Breast cancer is the most common cancer and the second leading cause of cancer deaths in American women. More than 192,000 new cases and 40,000 deaths from the disease are expected in the U.S. this year.

Mammograms can find cancer early, and two-thirds of women over 40 report having had the test in the previous two years. But how much they cut the risk of dying of the disease, and at what cost in terms of unneeded biopsies, expense and worry, have been debated.

In most women, tumors are slow-growing, and that likelihood increases with age. So there is little risk by extending the time between mammograms, some researchers say. Even for the minority of women with aggressive, fast-growing tumors, annual screening will make little difference in survival odds.

The new guidelines balance these risks and benefits, scientists say.

The probability of dying of breast cancer after age 40 is 3 percent, they calculate. Getting a mammogram every other year from ages 50 to 69 lowers that risk by about 16 percent.

"It's an average of five lives saved per thousand women screened," said Georgetown University researcher Dr. Jeanne Mandelblatt.

Starting at age 40 would prevent one additional death but also lead to 470 false alarms for every 1,000 women screened. Continuing mammograms through age 79 prevents three additional deaths but raises the number of women treated for breast cancers that would not threaten their lives.

"You save more lives because breast cancer is more common, but you diagnose tumors in women who were destined to die of something else. The overdiagnosis increases in older women," Mandelblatt said.

She led six teams around the world who used federal data on cancer and mammography to develop mathematical models of what would happen if women were screened at different ages and time intervals. Their conclusions helped shape the new guidelines.

Several medical groups say they are sticking to their guidelines that call for routine screening starting at 40.

"Screening isn't perfect. But it's the best thing we have. And it works," said Dr. Carol Lee, a spokeswoman for the American College of Radiology. She suggested that cutting health care costs may have played a role in the decision, but Petitti said the task force does not consider cost or insurance in its review.

The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists also has qualms. The organization's Dr. Hal Lawrence said there is still significant benefit to women in their 40s, adding: "We think that women deserve that benefit."

But Dr. Amy Abernethy of the Duke Comprehensive Cancer Center agreed with the task force's changes.

"Overall, I think it really took courage for them to do this," she said. "It does ask us as doctors to change what we do and how we communicate with patients. That's no small undertaking."

Abernethy, who is 41, said she got her first mammogram the day after her 40th birthday, even though she wasn't convinced it was needed. Now she doesn't plan to have another mammogram until she is 50.

Barbara Brenner, executive director of the San Francisco-based Breast Cancer Action, said the group was "thrilled" with the revisions. The advocacy group doesn't support screening before menopause, and will be changing its suggested interval from yearly to every two years, she said.

Mammograms, like all medical interventions, have risks and benefits, she said.

"Women are entitled to know what they are and to make their best decisions," she said. "These guidelines will help that conversation."

(The Associated Press contributed to this report.)

Copyright © 2023 WLS-TV. All Rights Reserved.