"Madigan wanted. ComEd gave. ComEd got," said Assistant U.S Attorney Diane MacArthur, as she began presenting the government's closing argument, saying that to prove a conspiracy, "the agreement doesn't have to be said out loud. It can be understood."
[Ads /]
SEE ALSO | Defense rests its case in 'ComEd Four' trial bribery case involving Michael Madigan
"This was ComEd's inner circle that worked together for years," MacArthur said.
To prove their point, the government used the defendants' own words, replaying many of the calls heard over the last several weeks.
"I mean it's, it's un, it's unmentioned but, you know, that which is understood need not be mentioned," John Hooker could be heard saying in a March 2019 call with Mike McClain.
"Right, exactly. Exactly," McClain responded.
READ MORE | ComEd 4 trial: Former ComEd CEO Anne Pramaggiore defends actions in bribery case; Hooker testifies
Prosecutors laid out the involvement of defendants Anne Pramaggiore, McClain, Hooker and Jay Doherty in what they said was a years-long conspiracy to bribe then-Illinois House Speaker Mike Madigan.
[Ads /]
"We had to hire these guys because Mike Madigan came to us. That's, it's that simple," said McClain in a February 2019 call.
"That's how simple it is," Hooker responded.
The government said a slew of jobs and contracts were given to Madigan's associates in exchange for getting legislation important to the company through the General Assembly.
"The only people that even know about this are you and perhaps Anne, if she even remembers the particulars, John Hooker, and me," said Doherty in a January 2019 call.
"Okay," Fidel Marquez responded.
RELATED | 'ComEd Four' trial: Prosecution rests its case as former CEO says she plans to testify
[Ads /]
"You take good care of me and, and so does our friend and I will do the best that I can to, to take care of you," Pramaggiore said in a September 2018 call with McClain.
But, even as the government attempted to connect the timing of each of the favors granted to Madigan over the years to the passage of three major pieces of legislation worth hundreds of millions of dollars to ComEd, defense attorneys kicked off their closing arguments.
Defense attorneys argued that "there is no evidence that Madigan did anything for them." They also argued that prosecutors "have no witness. They have no email. They have no tape that links them."
SEE ALSO | Chicago political foot soldier Ed Moody takes the stand in 'ComEd Four' trial
Defense attorneys also added, as they have throughout the trial, that ComEd often turned down Madigan's job recommendations and, that it was real and legal lobbying by the utility company that caused legislation to pass and not a dozen jobs given over a nine-year period.
"This conspiracy exists only in the minds of the government, not in reality," said defense attorney Scott Lassar this afternoon," said Defense Attorney Scott Lassar.
Defense Attorney Patrick Cotter accused the government of going after the defendants as part of a continuing effort to "get" Madigan.
"Don't let Mike McClain or these other good people be collateral damage in that war," Cotter said.
Defense closing will continue on Tuesday as each of the four defendants' attorneys take their turn. After that, the government will get their say one more time before sending the case to the jury.