Jury selection in Mike Madigan trial stretches into 2nd week, with court resuming Tuesday
The jury that will determine the fate of former Illinois House Speaker Michael Madigan is nearly complete after three slow days of jury selection last week.
But, in addition to the 11 jurors who have already been chosen, one final jury member must survive challenges, plus six alternates - a larger number than other recent federal corruption trials, owing to the length of Madigan's.
Jury selection continues Tuesday, after the trial took a break for the holiday weekend.
U.S. District Judge Robert Blakey has repeatedly told the attorneys they should take whatever time they need. But he has also warned the pace would delay the trial one week beyond its original 10-week schedule. On Friday, Blakey and the attorneys agreed that opening statements would be pushed to Monday, Oct. 21.
So far, the jury pool has been overwhelmingly white, though the jurors selected are a more diverse group of eight women and three men. The jury so far includes a teacher, an Amazon warehouse worker, an overnight nurse and a Goodwill donation center employee.
The Goodwill employee, who was chosen Friday, told attorneys she's considering moving out of Illinois because she didn't want to continue raising her son in Chicago due to violence and the cost of living.
The jury will also include a woman who said that when she told her best friend about her jury summons, the friend predicted that she was being called for the Madigan case - and told her to "vote guilty" for the former Democratic House speaker.
"She's a Trumper," the juror said of her friend, referring to her support for former President Donald Trump. "She really hates all Democrats except me, maybe."
Prosecutors and attorneys for Madigan and McClain have already agreed to dismiss dozens of prospective jurors based on their answers to a lengthy questionnaire they filled out earlier this week. Many of those dismissals were made because the jurors couldn't commit to the full trial, though a number of them were nixed because their questionnaire answers expressed animus toward politicians in general or Madigan in particular.
While some prospective jurors who made it to the questioning in the courtroom had heard of Madigan or remembered seeing something about the charges in the news, many had never heard his name.
One juror told attorneys that he'd grown up in Chicago's Chinatown neighborhood and was even familiar with a parking lot that will factor into the trial when prosecutors present evidence about a proposed hotel project in that neighborhood. Prosecutors allege Madigan improperly accepted former Chicago Ald. Danny Solis' offer to direct property tax work for the project to Madigan's law firm in exchange for an appointment on a state board for Solis, though neither the appointment nor the hotel project ever panned out.
On his questionnaire, the potential juror also wrote the words "scandal" and "fraud" in association with Madigan and said that he'd remembered a history teacher in high school speaking negatively about the former speaker, though he claimed to be "neutral" about Madigan now.
After 45 minutes of questioning, Blakey ultimately booted the potential juror, siding with defense attorneys' concerns about his preconceived notions.
Though some prospective jurors who were questioned in the courtroom said they were casual consumers of news, many expressed apathy or even disinterest about current events and politics. Others were unclear on the concept of lobbying and believed it to be illegal.
- ABC7 Chicago contributed
