CHICAGO (WLS) -- Actor Jussie Smollett is asking the Illinois Supreme Court to review a ruling that upheld his Cook County conviction for lying about an alleged hate crime, court records show.
In December, an Illinois appeals court upheld Smollett's disorderly conduct conviction.
The Illinois Supreme Court could hear the case, refuse to hear the case or send it back to the appellate court for review.
The appeals court voted 2-1 in favor of upholding the conviction.
In 2021, the former "Empire" TV star was convicted of faking a racist and homophobic attack in 2019 and then lying to police about it. His attorneys appealed that conviction, arguing that he should not have been punished for the same crime twice.
Back in 2019, he and Cook County State's Attorney Kim Foxx had reached an agreement to drop the charges against him in exchange for $10,000 bond and community service. The special prosecutor was then appointed in 2020.
Smollett's lawyers claimed his conviction violated his fifth amendment rights against double jeopardy, which is a legal protection against a person being punished for the same crime twice.
The special prosecutor disagreed with their premise, arguing that Smollett did get due process and was never prosecuted in the 2019 case, adding that the agreement for his release included an understanding that he could be re-charged for the original crime.
Smollett's attorneys added that the special prosecutor, who they say never should've been appointed, also did not turn over important evidence to the defense team from an hour's long discussion with the Osundairo brothers.
ABC7 legal analyst Gil Soffer said the ruling was a strong win for the special prosecutor, considering all the arguments raised by the defense.
The ruling meant Smollett must finish his entire 150 day jail sentence for the crime. He served six days before being released last year.
"The Illinois Supreme Court process is really the end of the road for him and it's not likely to give him much success," Soffer said. "It's pretty hard to get a hearing before the Supreme Court and even harder to win ultimately when you're there."